ArchivoAéreo

Blackburn Blackburd

3 min read
Blackburn Blackburd

In late 1917, the Admiralty issued a requirement for a deck-based torpedo bomber to replace the outdated Sopwith Cuckoo. In response, H. Booth, a designer at the Blackburn company, developed a machine named Blackburd.

Innovative Design Features

Although the wings of this single-seater, all-wooden biplane were traditional—folding backward for storage in a ship’s hangar and featuring powerful mechanization for its time—the rest was somewhat unusual. The designer gave the fuselage a perfect box shape, only slightly tapered at the tail. This design wasn’t particularly beautiful but was strong and simple to manufacture.

The “boxiness” was accentuated by the 350 hp Rolls-Royce Eagle VIII inline engine, especially its flat frontal radiator. Due to the engine’s considerable weight, the horizontal stabilizer had an inverted camber to prevent nose-down pitching during both flight and landing. The pilot’s cockpit was located far behind the biplane wing structure, offering no forward visibility.

The Detachable Landing Gear

However, the most astonishing detail of the aircraft was its landing gear. It was wheeled, as the machine was intended for true aircraft carriers like the HMS Argus. Yet, wheeled landing gear typically implied a common axle in those years, which, however, prevented a torpedo from being suspended beneath the aircraft, as it obstructed its release.

Blackburn solved this problem simply: the axle with wheels detached immediately after takeoff. The aircraft (naturally, already without the torpedo) was then supposed to land on two independent ski-like landing skids with shock absorbers. These shock absorbers produced an unexpected effect: during landing, due to uneven loads, the aircraft wobbled from side to side and “shuffled” comically on its landing skids. As for the tail skid, it was virtually non-existent, and the machine landed on its own rear.

Prototypes and Testing

In late May 1918, trials of the first Blackburd began. The results were far from brilliant; its handling left much to be desired, which was a serious defect for a deck-based aircraft. Ultimately, the aeroplane crashed.

The second Blackburd was used for practicing torpedo attacks and featured a modified tail unit, a larger engine radiator, and underwing floats for emergency water landings. The third Blackburd was almost an exact copy of the second, with the difference being special sealed compartments in the nose of the fuselage to keep the aircraft afloat during water landings. This machine underwent deck trials on the HMS Argus, and there is information that a second cockpit for a passenger was installed on it late in its career.

Neither the Blackburd nor its competitor, the Shirl, went into series production. Instead, additional Sopwith Cuckoos were ordered, and by the early 1920s, the “ugly” torpedo bomber became history.

Technical Specifications

Modification Blackburd
Wingspan, m 16.00
Length, m 10.60
Height, m 3.77
Wing area, m2 63.55
Empty weight 1465
Normal takeoff weight 2585
Engine type 1 Piston engine Rolls-Royce Eagle VIII
Power, hp 1 x 350
Maximum speed, km/h 175
Cruising speed, km/h 153
Practical range, km 800
Service ceiling, m 3600
Crew, crew members 1
Armament 1 torpedo

Image and diagram gallery of the Blackburn Blackburd

Blackburd
Blackburd
Blackburd
Blackburd
Blackburd
Blackburd
Blackburd
Blackburd
Blackburd
Blackburd
Blackburd
Blackburd
Blackburd
Blackburd
Blackburd
Blackburd
Blackburd
Blackburd
Blackburd
Blackburd
Blackburd
Blackburd
Blackburd
Blackburd
Blackburd
Blackburd

British

ArchivoAéreo Editorial Team

A group of aviation researchers and enthusiasts dedicated to documenting and preserving global aeronautical history. All articles are reviewed to ensure historical accuracy.

Sources & Accuracy

The information presented in this technical sheet has been compiled from declassified flight manuals, historical archives, and specialized literature. While we strive for maximum accuracy, some performance data may vary depending on the specific variant or operational conditions.